Pentax K-30

FIRST IMPRESSIONS


When the Pentax K-30 was announced with the specs similar to the K-5 (a tough act to follow) I assumed it would be similar to how the Pentax K10D would evolve into the Pentax K200D and the Pentax K-m.  Having owned a K10D I would definitely feel downgraded if I had to shift to either the K200D or the K-m even if the sensor and image quality is at par or even improved compared to the original camera.  Of course, that is merely a ‘feeling’ since I can readily ‘downgrade’ myself to use something with the feature set of an entry level camera as I would later with the Pentax K-x.  While there were reasons why I needed to use the K-x, with the K-5 as my main camera I wondered why I would even give the K-30 any attention.

The K-30 shares the same sensor of the K-5 (as well as the K-01) so I would assume that it would be about the same or even better in some respects to the older model; so I’m basically looking at the possibility that all that it has over the K-5 is that it looks rugged.

While the button layout is similar to the K-x/K-r, I was pleasantly surprised that it had dual user configurable dials; it had the AF-S/AF-C/MF dial similar to the K-5 not like the AF/MF slide switch of the K-r.  The viewfinder shared the same information set as the K-5: it has the graph that displays the exposure value not merely the numeric display of the lower model cameras.

My son likes it better than my K-5 because he says it does not disrupt his muscle memory when it comes to punching buttons so it becomes a clear upgrade for those used to the K-x/K-r.  But as word has it, the K-30 is not simply the latest entry level in line-up of Pentax.  As it stands now, ‘entry-level’ is occupied by the Pentax Q and the K-01; the Pentax K-30 is touted as mid-level model which may make the successor to the K-5 something really interesting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Ever Happened to Job’s Wife?

Hapid 2016

Bong Manayon's Ignatian Guide to Buying DSLRs (or any digital device for that matter)